Subelement C: Satellite Systems— Topic :
Question 32C5
Element 9 (GMDSS Maintainer)Interference induced from nearby HF transmitters may cause Inmarsat system failures. What is the most appropriate action to resolve this problem?
Explanation
Nearby HF transmitters can induce unwanted RF currents on the cables (coaxial, power, data) connected to sensitive equipment like an Inmarsat terminal. These induced currents, often common-mode, can enter the equipment's circuitry and cause interference or system failure.
**Installing ferrite clamps on the coax cable (D)** is an effective solution. Ferrite material increases the impedance to common-mode currents flowing along the outside of a cable, essentially choking off the induced RF energy before it can reach the sensitive Inmarsat electronics. This directly suppresses the "induced RF."
**Installing a longer ground lead (A)** is generally counterproductive for RF. Longer ground leads increase inductance, making them less effective for RF grounding and potentially creating resonant points that worsen interference.
**Installing a low-pass filter (LPF) between the coax cable and antenna (B)** would block frequencies *above* a certain cutoff. Inmarsat operates in the L-band (1.5-1.6 GHz), while HF is much lower (3-30 MHz). An LPF on the Inmarsat terminal would pass its desired signals but block higher frequencies, which is not the source of HF interference. The problem is HF energy coupling into the system, not unwanted higher frequencies.
Related Questions
32C3 What condition would cause an IP connection failure between a technician’s laptop and an Inmarsat Fleet Broadband terminal?32C4 What condition would cause a connection failure between a technician’s laptop and an Inmarsat Fleet Broadband terminal?32C6 What condition will lower the observed bit rate on a Fleet Broadband terminal?33D1 Which is not a function of a satellite under COSPAS-SARSAT using satellite EPIRBs?33D2 What is the purpose of the magnet in the EPIRB mounting bracket?